ACOMPANHAMENTO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO MOTOR DE PREMATURO EXTREMO COM A ESCALA ALBERTA E INTERVENÇÃO PELO CONCEITO BOBATH - RELATO DE CASO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor e um processo sequencial no qual o individuo progride nas habilidades motoras, sendo a prematuridade um fator de risco. Dessa maneira, o objetivo do presente estudo foi verificar a influencia do Conceito Neuroevolutivo Bobath (CNB) sobre o desenvolvimento motor de uma crianca prematura extrema. Para a avaliacao foi utilizada a escala de desenvolvimento motor de Alberta (AIMS). O tratamento foi realizado durante um periodo de sete meses, com o uso de brinquedos de forma ludica para estimular respostas motoras voluntarias na crianca, manuseios e facilitacoes baseadas no CNB em todos os decubitos. Os resultados indicam melhora no desenvolvimento da crianca que evoluiu do percentil 75 apos sete meses de intervencao. Conclui-se que o CNB contribuiu para a melhora no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor de uma crianca extremamente prematura aproximando os seus escores de desenvolvimento ao escore tipico. Palavras-chave: Prematuridade, Desenvolvimento motor, Bobath, AIMS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".