MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905448450 · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy261

Data Resource Profile: Cardiovascular H3Africa Innovation Resource (CHAIR)

2018· article· en· W2905448450 on OpenAlexaff
Mayowa Owolabi, Onoja Akpa, Felix Made, Sally N. Adebamowo, Akinlolu Ojo, Dwomoa Adu, Ayesha A. Motala, Bongani M. Mayosi, Bruce Ovbiagele, Clement Adebamowo, Bamidele O. Tayo, Charles N. Rotimi, Rufus Akinyemi, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Fred Stephen Sarfo, Kolawole Wahab, Rulan S. Parekh, Mark E. Engel, Chisala Chisala, Emmanuel Peprah, George A. Mensah, Ken Wiley, Jennifer L. Troyer, Michèle Ramsay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Epidemiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthWellcome Trust
KeywordsResource (disambiguation)BusinessMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) constitute the majority of the world’s population and bear more than 80% of the global burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD).1,2 The recent increases in CVD globally are also reflected in LMIC, where the prevalence of overall deaths from CVD was 28% in 20013 and premature CVD mortality was 37% in 2015.4 The paucity of data regarding the drivers of the CVD epidemic and contextualized solutions is, in part, because less than 10% of the global research resources and facilities for implementation are found in LMIC.5,6 Therefore LMIC are particularly disadvantaged in dealing with the CVD burden with targeted interventions. at the individual and community levels. due to the lack of data availability. A key development poised to improve the understanding and control of CVD in LMICs in Africa is the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Consortium, of which the H3Africa Cardiovascular Disease Working Group (CVDWG) is a core component.6,7 The CVDWG includes six of the H3Africa projects spread across 13 African countries (Figure 1) . The six projects include: the African Collaborative Center for Microbiome and Genomics Research (ACCME), which also collects data on CVD; the Genomic and Environmental Risk Factors for Cardiometabolic Disease in Africans (AWI-Gen); the burden, spectrum and aetiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus in sub-Saharan Africa (DM group); the H3Africa Kidney Disease Research Network (Kidney group); the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease Network (RHDGen); and the Stroke Investigative Research and Educational Network (SIREN). Map of Africa showing location or study sites of the participants from the six H3Africa studies, based on recruitment as at 30 September 2016. The CVDWG is focused on developing genomic research and training infrastructure that will enable Africa to benefit from the genomic revolution. Specifically, the CVDWG is building the Cardiovascular H3Africa Innovation Resource (CHAIR), which aims to include >55 000 participants, with 30 044 participants in the first phase, as the largest cohort of continental Africans for studies on genomic and environmental contributions to CVD in Africa. CHAIR comprises phenotype data relevant to the cardiovascular disease spectrum, including sociodemographic, anthropometric, clinical, biochemical (blood and urine biomarkers) and genomic data as well as stored biological samples for future research. CHAIR is the combined resource of six independent research projects (Table 1; Supplementary Table 1, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). In this first phase, combined data from 30 044 participants of both genders and across age groups, from 15 African countries, have been combined using a careful harmonization process to ensure data equivalency. It is anticipated that the CHAIR resource will have data on close to 100 CVD-related phenotypes and genomic data for >55 000 participants. At the current wave of data collection, data completeness is >90% for most important CVD risk factors and almost 100% for stored samples (Table 2). Participating H3Africa Consortium Projects that constitute CHAIR Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya South Africa Cameroon Guinea Malawi Nigeria South Africa Tanzania Uganda Ghana Ethiopia Kenya Nigeria Cases: outpatient clinics and patient admissions Controls: outpatient clinics 7964 (targeted: ∼4000 kidney disease cases and ∼4000 kidney disease-free controls) Kenya Mozambique Namibia Nigeria South Africa Sudan Uganda Zambia Ghana Nigeria Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya South Africa Cameroon Guinea Malawi Nigeria South Africa Tanzania Uganda Ghana Ethiopia Kenya Nigeria Cases: outpatient clinics and patient admissions Controls: outpatient clinics 7964 (targeted: ∼4000 kidney disease cases and ∼4000 kidney disease-free controls) Kenya Mozambique Namibia Nigeria South Africa Sudan Uganda Zambia Ghana Nigeria PI, Principal investigator (www.h3a.org). Participating H3Africa Consortium Projects that constitute CHAIR Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya South Africa Cameroon Guinea Malawi Nigeria South Africa Tanzania Uganda Ghana Ethiopia Kenya Nigeria Cases: outpatient clinics and patient admissions Controls: outpatient clinics 7964 (targeted: ∼4000 kidney disease cases and ∼4000 kidney disease-free controls) Kenya Mozambique Namibia Nigeria South Africa Sudan Uganda Zambia Ghana Nigeria Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya South Africa Cameroon Guinea Malawi Nigeria South Africa Tanzania Uganda Ghana Ethiopia Kenya Nigeria Cases: outpatient clinics and patient admissions Controls: outpatient clinics 7964 (targeted: ∼4000 kidney disease cases and ∼4000 kidney disease-free controls) Kenya Mozambique Namibia Nigeria South Africa Sudan Uganda Zambia Ghana Nigeria PI, Principal investigator (www.h3a.org). Key variables being collected across different projects in CHAIR M/F, male/female. Key variables being collected across different projects in CHAIR M/F, male/female. Participants include cases (selected by disease status) and controls (specific disease-free controls and cross-sectional population-based controls) and are resident in Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda or Zambia (Figure 1). Recruitment strategies and CVD phenotypes that were measured are similar but not identical across the projects. Most projects have also published their research protocols.8,15–19 Each study had its own inclusion and exclusion criteria, and most studies started recruitment in 2012 and completed recruitment in 2017. Most studies are planning longitudinal follow-up of participants. Study instruments used by the participant studies were administered by well-trained fieldworkers and research professionals, using validated approaches to harmonize data. One of the two cross-sectional studies is a population-based study (both have plans for longitudinal follow-up in the next wave of data collection), and four studies are population-based longitudinal cohorts or case-control disease-based studies. Studies with longitudinal data collections within the first phase of H3Africa (mid-2012 to mid-2017) are shown in Supplementary Table 2, available as Supplementary data at IJE online; and one is planning follow-up in a second phase. For instance, the Kidney group used a case-control study design and plan annual follow-up visits of the cases over a period of 5 years, to assess kidney disease progression and other clinical events.18 The SIREN study followed up patients with stroke at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after discharge from hospital.8 The ACCME group conducted a prospective cohort study where demographic and clinical data were collected at baseline and then during follow-up visits every 6 months for 2 years.9,15 The AWI-Gen study is a cross-sectional population-based study of older adults which will be developed into a longitudinal cohort with follow-up after approximately 5 years from the first recruitment, to assess progression of, or transition to, cardiometabolic disease states.16 The DM group is a cross-sectional study comprising two arms: a ‘clinic/case-series’ arm which includes participants with known diabetes attending a health facility; and in parallel, from the same geographical area, are drawn participants for the ‘population survey’ arm.17 RHDGen is a case-control study with cases with rheumatic disease recruited in a hospital-based setting and community-based controls, which can be contacted for further data collection.19 The CHAIR studies have obtained broad consent from most participants for the reuse of data and samples, and participants either been consented to be approached for future studies or will be reconsented when approached again for longitudinal data collection. Each participating study in CHAIR has independent but related robust case report forms (CRFs) for phenotype and laboratory data collection. Study CRFs consist of validated measures for capturing data on several phenotypes. For example, the Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke-Free Status (QVSFS)8 is used for determining stroke-free status with baseline blood pressure measured according to the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.9 Standing height, body weight, waist circumferences and obesity are measured in accordance with the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) Multinational Monitoring of Trends in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) project.10 A total of 67 phenotypes including: sociodemographic details (age, sex, country of residence, ethnicity, marital status, educational attainment and occupational status); socioeconomic status; medical history (infection with HIV, TB or malaria; history of hypertension, diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction, cancer and other infectious and non-infectious diseases and traits); lifestyle data (tobacco and alcohol exposure); family health history; and biomarkers of CVD relevance in blood and urine; are included in the CHAIR dataset (Table 2; and Supplementary Table 3, available as Supplementary data at IJE online). The questionnaires used for collecting data on these phenotypes are based on existing validated questionnaires and differ, in some cases, between participating studies. Where possible, when comparable measures were used, data have been harmonized across datasets. For instance, hypertension data were harmonized and defined as sustained systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, history of hypertension, or taking antihypertensive medications. Diabetes mellitus was harmonized and defined as history of diabetes mellitus, use of medications for diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose levels ≥126 mg/dL (or ≥200 mg/dL if failing to fast) and/or HBA1c >6.5%. Obesity was based on body mass index (kg/m2) calculated and classified as underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9) or obese (30+) or based on waist-to-hip ratio tertiles. All studies collect blood and/or other tissues or body fluids (e.g. urine) for DNA extraction and biomarker analysis. Several aliquots of each DNA sample from all participants are stored in an H3Africa Biorepository in Nigeria, Uganda or South Africa. Genome-wide variation data will be available for all studies. Four studies have used the H3Africa SNP genotyping array (∼2.3 M SNP Illumina Array enriched for common variation across African populations). RHDGen has used the Illumina Omni 2.5 M array, and the DM group will use a different array. African-based imputation panels are available to harmonize the disparate genomic data types. Although each project has its own research objectives, the shared resource will be able to tackle cross-cutting research questions and test hypotheses which the individual projects are underpowered to explore. For instance, we have collected and harmonized data on potential risk factors, including age, setting (urban or rural), weight, height, waist and hip circumference across the entire CHAIR cohort. In addition, we have stored biological samples including urine, serum, plasma and DNA from the majority of the participants. We have also developed an inclusive model for data harmonization which makes it possible to investigate multiple hypotheses, to address a wide spectrum of CVD risk factors in disease causation or influence. Therefore, CHAIR provides the opportunity to examine genomic associations with cardiovascular phenotypes across various African regions and urban/rural settings. This enhances the potential for discovery, validation and generalizability. CHAIR offers a pan-African perspective with unique opportunities for collaboration, including sharing of data on controls, provision of validation cohorts, meta-analyses, capacity-building for genomic research and development of infrastructure for CVD epidemiological, genomic, biobanking and bioinformatics research. The findings from the CHAIR research promise to inform the development of cost-effective diagnostic, preventive and therapeutic interventions at individual, health care system and population levels.12,13,20 Such interventions could be implemented through robust advocacy efforts involving all stakeholders working within and across African countries and regions. This would enhance the emergence of a healthy and economically vibrant continent. Baseline characteristics for 30 044 participants of CHAIR with available data as of 30 September 2016 are presented in Table 3. Overall, 57.0% were women. The proportion with hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg or confirmed diagnosis of hypertension by a health care worker or current use of antihypertensive medication) was 48.8% among men and 47.4% among women. Based on the 2017 guidelines for hypertension diagnosis (i.e. systolic blood pressure ≥120 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mm Hg in addition to confirmed diagnosis of hypertension by a health care worker or current use of antihypertensive medication), the proportion with hypertension was 74.8% among men and 69.6% among women, and the proportion with obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2] was 10.8% among men and 32.8% among women (Table 3). The proportion with hypertension and obesity varied among projects, influenced by individual participant selection. For instance, the proportion with hypertension was highest in the SIREN study on stroke, and similarly the proportion with obesity was highest in the type 2 diabetes study (Table 3). Preliminary baseline characteristics for 30 044 CHAIR participants from five studies as at 30 September 2016 Percentages of completed data for the baseline characteristics were: 100.0% for sex; 100.0% for age; 97.0% for height; 97.1% for weight; 98.8% for systolic blood pressure; 98.8% for diastolic blood pressure. SD, standard deviation. These rates may have been affected by the design and disease focus of the individual study. Preliminary baseline characteristics for 30 044 CHAIR participants from five studies as at 30 September 2016 Percentages of completed data for the baseline characteristics were: 100.0% for sex; 100.0% for age; 97.0% for height; 97.1% for weight; 98.8% for systolic blood pressure; 98.8% for diastolic blood pressure. SD, standard deviation. These rates may have been affected by the design and disease focus of the individual study. The CVDWG has published position papers6,7 describing the current knowledge of CVD in Africa and also articulating the opportunities and challenges for future CVD research in Africa.6,7,21–30 To ensure accurate exclusion of stroke mimics, a pictographic version of the Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke-Free Status with superior diagnostic properties including 98% certainty for determining stroke-free status, which was validated in three languages commonly spoken in West Africa (including Ghana), was developed.31 Such free but robust instruments for stroke diagnosis, a leading cause of CVD in Africa, could be deployed in the follow-up of study participants across the CHAIR consortium. Some cardiovascular disease-specific findings from some of the collaborating studies32 suggest the need for a unique cardiovascular risk calculator for Africans. In a recent report, one of the studies (SIREN)14,33 identified leading risk factors for stroke in the continent, that is: hypertension, dyslipidaemia, regular meat consumption, elevated waist-to-hip ratio, diabetes, low green leafy vegetable consumption, stress, salt added at the table, cardiac disease, physical inactivity and tobacco use. These factors will be investigated further using the CHAIR resource.14,33 The AWI-Gen study found significant sex differences in the prevalence of hypertension in four of their six study centres and regional differences in prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension.34 This suggests the need for the implementation of regionally appropriate and context-driven targeted interventions for hypertension in Africa. In a cohort of sexually active HIV-negative adult women with no previous history of cervical abnormalities, cervical cancer or total abdominal hysterectomy, the ACCME study found a 21% prevalence of persistent human papilloma virus (HPV) infection.15 There was also a reported history of physician-diagnosed hypertension (15%), diabetes (2%), hypercholesterolaemia (4%) or heart disease (0.3%).15 These results provide important data for studies of associations between these characteristics and HPV-associated cancers including cervical cancer.15 The RHDGen project, in a 5-year follow-up study of latent Rheumatic heart diseases (RHD) among school pupils and using the World Heart Federation (WHF) echocardiographic criteria, found that latent RHD resolves to normal in nearly half of school pupils.19 It is therefore a necessity to repeat echocardiography in cases of latent RHD before considering an intervention. A comprehensive list of publications from the CVDWG is available on the H3Africa website: [http://h3africa.org/links/publications]. The main strength of the CHAIR cohort is its large anticipated final sample size of over 55 000 African participants, which is powered to validate and examine many genetic risk factors for quantitative traits including BMI and lipid levels, where genetic markers have low or moderate effects. With a sample size of at least 50 000, the study will have >95% power to detect associations with quantitative traits with an effect size (beta value) of 0.2 for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.05, and >90% power to detect a beta value of 0.1 for SNPs with MAF 0.20. In case-control studies with 6000 cases and 6000 controls, there will be >95% power to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 1.2 (MAF 0.05) and >90% to detect an OR of 1.1 (MAF 0.20). Other strengths include the harmonized high-quality phenotype data and the availability of genome-wide genotyping data on all participants and access to DNA samples. All studies also have community engagement, training and capacity building components and have produced freely available protocols, guidelines, training materials and analysis tools that can be used in similar studies and are adapted to the African context. Also, although electronic medical records are scarce and diseases and vital registries are incomplete in Africa in general, some of the hospital-based studies could do passive follow-up from hospital records and the AWI-Gen study, which is nested in HDSS, can refer to verbal autopsies in the cases of deaths. A limitation of CHAIR is the lack of standardization of data collection tools across all six studies. The harmonization process, however, has ensured that data are compared in a meaningful way for the cardinal CVD risk factors. Furthermore, most studies will also have genomic data and, for those not using the H3Africa Illumina SNP array, genetic analyses will use imputation strategies to develop a common dataset to analyse pooled phenotypic data using advanced meta-analytical techniques.35,36 This CHAIR resource is available to researchers (members and non-members of the H3Africa Consortium) worldwide according to the H3Africa guidelines and policies [https://www.h3africa.org/consortium/documents]. Data will be submitted to the European Genome-phenome and will have a of 12 or the first is the The harmonized phenotype data of CHAIR will also be stored in a and will be through unique to genomic data. and phenotype data will be available at and the European Genome-phenome DNA samples will be from the H3Africa A access model has been implemented for data and samples, and will be available after by the H3Africa Data and panels will be available to ensure that a genomic dataset can be developed for the H3Africa for more CHAIR is the largest harmonized resource of cardiovascular diseases in Africans with genomic, environmental and phenotypic data from participants across the entire cardiovascular CHAIR is the first and in Africa with the potential for cross-cutting research questions with power and With an of 000 and participants, the resource comprises data on adults from 15 African countries, recruited by six studies including the DM Kidney RHDGen and SIREN at baseline and with a longitudinal follow-up data. within CHAIR has been as ACCME 6 months for 2 Kidney group SIREN months for Studies AWI-Gen and DM group have for follow-up in the next wave of data collection. RHDGen is a cross-sectional study with no biological samples are available for future studies on genetic and of cardiovascular diseases and among of African CHAIR can be through the H3Africa The harmonization process for the CHAIR is by the SIREN is by the The AWI-Gen Collaborative is by the as of the H3Africa The ACCME cohort is by the of Health The DM study spectrum and aetiology of type 2 diabetes in sub-Saharan is by the The RHDGen Network is by the and The H3Africa Kidney Disease Research Consortium is by the is by the of the at the Center for Research on Genomics and Health the is also by and the of the The of this is the of the and not the of the of Health or the We for the power using The for All to study design and data and are CHAIR to data harmonization and analysis. and to of results and of the All to of the and of the final

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.118
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.118
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6400.468

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of EpidemiologySame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207