MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La edición de las acotaciones

2018· book-chapter· en· W2905467659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca di rassegna iberistica/Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsideAutographMeaning (existential)ArtHumanitiesLiteraturePhilosophyLinguisticsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this article is to clarify both the meaning of the use of the word aparte (aside) in the autographs of Lope de Vega, and the use of other verbal expressions or graphic marks that refer to the disposition of the actors on the stage to speak separately, with obvious spatial and enunciative implications. Therefore, the article deals with the use of ‘aside’ in the Spanish Comedia , the indication of the ‘asides’ in the manuscripts and printed texts of the 17h century, its treatment in the edition of modern dramatic texts, and the perspectives that the digital medium opens for the edition of the stage directions and, in particular, of those that indicate the asides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0230.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it