Bibliographic record
Abstract
À travers six œuvres sélectionnées chez six grands artistes de la BD québécoise, choisis à chaque époque de 1900 à nos jours, cet article tente de répondre à cette question qui peut sembler ambigüe. Nous pourrons constater en regardant attentivement ces œuvres-phares qu’elles portent en elles cette double identité, québécoise et canadienne, qui les dynamise et les caractérise. Baptiste, le cocasse diplomate international d’Albéric Bourgeois (1876-1962), Onésime et les ruraux d’Albert Chartier(1912-2004), le super anti-héros loufoque Capitaine Kébec de Pierre Fournier (1949- ), le Carcajou fripon amérindien de Grozoeil (pseud. Christine Laniel (1951- ), la citadine solitaire du métro de Julie Doucet (1965- ), enfin Paul face à la société québécoise de Michel Rabagliati (1961- ), tous à leur façon sont les chantres d’une façon de voir qui nous réunit à travers nos divergences. Entre Baptiste, Onésime, Capitaine Kébec et Carcajou, il y a cette sorte d’humour complice qui est l’humour minoritaire. Quant aux alter egos de Doucet et de Rabagliati, à travers leurs fables autobiographiques, ils promènent leurs regards sur la double facette de la cité contemporaine, de l’anonymat à la solidarité, de la non-identité aux identités plurielles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".