MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recurrent Benign Pneumatosis Intestinalis in a Patient With Mixed Connective Tissue Disease

2018· article· en· W2905498565 on OpenAlexaff
Sahil Koppikar

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Rheumatology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPneumoperitoneumPneumatosis intestinalisMedicinePneumatosis Cystoides IntestinalisConnective tissue diseaseConnective tissueAbdomenPeritonitisRadiologyAcute abdomenPelvisPerforationComplicationSurgeryDiseasePathologyLaparoscopyAutoimmune disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connective tissue diseases can be associated with rare gastrointestinal complications such as pneumatosis intestinalis and pneumoperitoneum. In this article, we report a unique case of recurrent pneumatosis intestinalis and spontaneous pneumoperitoneum without evidence of peritonitis in a patient with long-standing mixed connective tissue disease. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed pneumatosis of the jejunum and intra-abdominal free air, without evidence of perforation. The patient was managed non-operatively. Prior to discharge, on post-admission day two, imaging revealed resolution of the pneumatosis but persistent large volume pneumoperitoneum. It is important for clinicians to recognize pneumatosis and pneumoperitoneum as a possible benign complication in patients with mixed connective tissue disease and differentiate it from ruptured viscous. The management of benign spontaneous pneumoperitoneum can be supportive, thereby avoiding unnecessary investigations and surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of RheumatologySame topicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207