MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905509591 · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2884463

Optimum Management of Urban Traffic Flow Based on a Stochastic Dynamic Model

2018· article· en· W2905509591 on OpenAlexaff
Shian Wang, N. U. Ahmed, Tet Yeap

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)ThroughputTraffic congestionTraffic flow (computer networking)Optimal controlDynamic programmingEngineeringAlgorithmTransport engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we use a recently developed dynamic model for urban traffic flow subject to practical constraint characteristics of intersections equipped with traffic light. We define an objective functional based on the analytical expressions for traffic throughput, congestion, and drivers’ waiting time at an intersection. Following this, an optimization problem is formulated and an algorithm is presented based on the principle of optimality due to Bellman. The solution, if implemented, is expected to improve throughput, reduce congestion, avoid traffic jams, and promote driver satisfaction. The system is simulated with a series of numerical experiments and the corresponding optimization problems are solved using the proposed algorithm. The optimal feedback control laws independent of initial state are acquired, and the optimal cost is found according to any given initial condition. It is believed that this dynamic model would be potentially applicable for the real-time adaptive traffic control system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207