COSSACKS PHENOMENON AS THE NATION PRESERVING FACTOR OF CULTURE OF THE UKRAINIAN DIASPORA OF CANADA (MIDDLE OF XX - BEGINNING OF ХХІ CENTURY)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this scientific article consists of definition of ways of maintaining national memory by representatives of the Ukrainian diaspora of Canada on the basis of the glorious Cossack past. The necessary quantity of sources and historiographic literature which concerned various aspects of the touched issue has been attracted to achievement of the specified purpose. The author has used such following scientific methods of a research as the analysis, historical genetic and historical comparative. Chronologically article is connected with the period of the middle of XX – the beginnings of the XXIst century. Within this scientific article activity of the cultural and scientific organizations connected with the Cossack direction has been considered. The author investigates influence of the Cossack culture on development of the Ukrainian society of Canada. The special attention is devoted to the Ukrainian festivals of the Cossacks in the territory of Canada. For the first time the attempt to give generalizing view on the different aspects of problem was made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".