MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905549499 · doi:10.1109/crv.2018.00056

Eye on the Sky: An Upward-Looking Monocular Teach-and-Repeat System for Indoor Environments

2018· article· en· W2905549499 on OpenAlexaff
Nan Zhang, Michael Warren, Timothy D. Barfoot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonocularComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMonocular visionPipeline (software)Path (computing)Range (aeronautics)SkyComputer graphics (images)Real-time computingGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual Teach and Repeat (VT&R) allows a robotic vehicle to navigate autonomously along a network of paths in the presence of illumination and scene changes. Traditionally, the system uses a stereo camera as the primary sensor for triangulating visual landmarks and often operates in highly textured outdoor environments. In this paper, we modify the VT&R system to use a monocular pipeline under the same framework, but also target indoor operation as a demonstration of a low-cost VT&R solution for warehouse logistics in a visually difficult environment. Unlike previous monocular VT&R solutions, we make no assumptions about the nature of the scene (e.g., local ground planarity). This allows the system to be readily deployable on more vehicles in a wider range of environments. To test the system, and motivated by a warehouse navigation application, an upward pointing camera is mounted on a Clearpath Husky ground vehicle. We demonstrate the vehicle is able to navigate with a 99.6% autonomy rate using such a system during 1.1 kilometers of driving, with an average scene depth that varies from 8-16 meters. The cross-track deviation from the taught path is less than 0.5 meters over 90% of the path, reaching a maximum of 0.85 meters and an average of 0.26 meters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207