Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl fuero de Daroca constituye el primer representante del derecho de frontera en Aragon. Este derecho privilegiado originado en la vecina Castilla fue recogido y reformulado por Alfonso I para su aplicacion en sus propios reinos. Desde Daroca se extendio por localidades navarras pero sobre todo por las nuevas localidades que se fueron recuperando en la zona turolense donde a traves de sus distintas versiones se constituyo en el principal instrumento de repoblacion y reorganizacion. El analisis del fuero de Daroca y los textos derivados de Alcala de la Selva, Canada de Benatanduz y Aliaga dan como resultado una compleja evolucion del derecho que se manifiesta en la concesion de varios textos oficiales y en la existencia de redacciones oficiosas sin personalidad legal elaboradas por funcionarios locales. La integracion de estos materiales se desarrollo durante mas de un siglo mientras se iba desarrollando paralelamente un derecho territorial que acabaria viendo la luz en los extensos fueros del siglo XIII EnglishThe chapter of Daroca is the first representative of the law border in Aragon. This privileged law originated in neighboring Castilla was collected and reformulated by Alfonso I for use in their kingdoms. From Daroca spread by Navarre localities but above all the new localities were recovered in the Teruel area where through its different versions it became the main instrument of repopulation and reorganization. Analysis of chapter jurisdiction of Daroca and texts derived from Alcala de la Selva, Canada de Benatanduz and Aliaga result in a complex evolution of the law manifested in the granting of various official texts and the existence of informal essays without legal personality made by local officials. The integration of these materials are developed for more than a century while it is was at the same time developing a territorial law up seeing the light on the extensive privileges of the 13th century
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".