DIÁLOGOS SOBRE A DESCONSIDERAÇÃO DA PERSONALIDADE JURÍDICA NO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL DE 2015 | DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2018v73p355
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All through the research of national legislation, legal literature and jurisprudence, as of the participatory methodology for the interpretation of the legal and normative phenomenon, this paper is about the procedure of disregard of the legal personality foreseen in the new Code of Civil Procedure in order to satisfy a gap in the procedural law regarding how to dismiss a legal entity in cases where the material law admits the * Este artigo é resultado de investigação que envolveu os projetos de pesquisa intitulados Garantias processuais civis dos bens transindividuais e Relações tensionais entre mercado, Estado e Sociedade: interesses públicos versus interesses privados, integrantes do grupo de pesquisa científica Tutelas à efetivação dos direitos indisponíveis do
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.032 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".