MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905657944 · doi:10.1002/qua.25888

The gas‐phase ozonolysis reaction of methylbutenol: A mechanistic study

2018· article· en· W2905657944 on OpenAlexaff
Mansour H. Almatarneh, Ismael A. Elayan, Abd Al‐Aziz A. Abu‐Saleh, Mohammednoor Altarawneh, Parisa A. Ariya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersDeanship of Academic Research, University of Jordan
KeywordsChemistryOzonolysisOzonideFormaldehydeRadicalPhotochemistryEpoxideFormic acidDissociation (chemistry)Reactivity (psychology)Reaction mechanismMedicinal chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The gas‐phase ozonolysis reaction of methylbutenol through the Criegee mechanism is investigated. The initial reaction leads to a primary ozonide (POZ) formation with barriers in the range of 10–28 kJ mol −1 . The formation of 2‐hydroxy‐2‐methyl‐propanal (HMP) and formaldehyde‐oxide is more favorable, by 10 kJ mol −1 , than the syn ‐CI and formaldehyde. The unimolecular dissociation of the more stable syn ‐CI via 1,5‐H transfer into an epoxide is more favored than the epoxide and 3 O 2 formation. The ester channel led to the formation of the acetone and formic acid favorably from the anti ‐CI. The hydration of the anti ‐CI with H 2 O and (H 2 O) 2 is significantly barrierless with a higher plausibility to the latter, and thus they may lead to the formation of peroxides and ultimately OH radicals, as well as airborne particulate matter. Reaction of anti ‐CI with water dimers enhances its atmospheric reactivity by a factor of 28 in reference to water monomers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207