Progress Derailed: How the Great War Altered the Course of French Psychiatry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The First World War marked an abrupt halt in the development of French psychology, particularly in the study of trauma. The 1880s and 1890s saw remarkable advancements in neurology, which included Jean-Martin Charcot's new research on hysteria. His studies redefined its origin and inspired many of the neurologists who would become integral in handling the devastating effects of "war neuroses" after the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. These wartime neurologists were faced with an onslaught of soldiers suffering from what were called "functional disorders", which consisted of physical symptoms without a corresponding injury. Symptoms of functional injuries ranged from "paralysis and anaesthesia to mutism and deafness". 1 Between the incredible number of cases doctors were presented with and the socio-political environment the War created in France, neurology underwent a shift in ideology away from Charcot's revelatory discoveries regarding hysteria. The priority of neurologists was now to cure the soldiers of their functional problems and return them to a desperate and demanding front line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it