MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905753711 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23439

Simultaneous removal of SO<sub>2</sub> and NO by CO reduction over prevulcanized Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/AC catalysts

2018· article· en· W2905753711 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yongji Song, Ting Wang, Liang Cheng, Cuiqing Li, Hong Wang, Xincheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
KeywordsCatalysisActivated carbonRedoxCarbon fibersCobaltCombustionIncipient wetness impregnationSelective catalytic reductionChemistryDenitrificationInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear chemistryPhysical chemistryNitrogenSelectivityEnvironmental chemistryAdsorptionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Low‐cost Fe 2 O 3 modified activated carbon catalysts have been prepared by a facile incipient‐wetness impregnation method and used for the low‐temperature simultaneous catalytic reduction of SO 2 and NO by CO. The effect of CO, NO, and SO 2 was studied experimentally by transient response method. Removal efficiencies of 95 % for NO and 100 % for SO 2 were obtained, respectively, for the optimum catalyst, in which the amount of Fe 2 O 3 was 10 wt%. It was found that the catalyst was robust enough under SO 2 and NO circumstances; moreover, the prevulcanization of Fe atoms was found to be essential for high efficiency. The reaction mechanism of the simultaneous desulphurization and denitrification reactions of Fe 2 O 3 /AC was proposed to follow both redox and COS mechanisms. These results make activated carbon supported Fe 2 O 3 highly promising for the simultaneous abatement of SO 2 and NO emissions generated during the combustion processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207