Patient‐specific pixel‐based weighting factor dual‐energy x‐ray imaging system using <i>a priori </i><scp>CT</scp> data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a novel patient-specific pixel-based weighting factor dual-energy (PP-DE) algorithm to effectively suppress bone throughout the image and overcome the limitation of the conventional DE algorithm with constant weighting factor which is restricted to regions with uniform patient thickness. Additionally, to derive theoretical expressions to describe the dependence of the weighting factors on several imaging parameters and validate them with measurement. METHODS: A step phantom was constructed consisting of slabs of solid water and bone materials. Thicknesses of bone ranged [0-6] cm in one direction and solid water [5-30] cm in the other direction. Projection images at 60 and 140 kVp were acquired using a clinical imaging system. Optimal weighting factors were found by iteratively varying it in the range [0-1.4], where bone and soft-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) reached zero. Bone and soft-tissue digitally reconstructed thicknesses were created using computed tomography (CT) images of a Rando phantom and ray tracing techniques. A weighting factor image (ω) was calculated using digitally reconstructed thicknesses (DRTs) and precalculated weighting factors from the step phantom. This ω image was then used to generate a PP-DE image. The PP-DE image was compared to the conventional DE image which uses a constant weighting factor throughout the image. The effect of the misaligned ω image on PP-DE images was investigated by acquiring LE and HE images at various shifts of Rando phantom. A rigid registration was used based on mutual information algorithm in Matlab. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated in the step phantom for the PP-DE image and compared to that of conventional DE technique. Analytical expressions for theoretical weighting factors were derived which included various effects such as beam hardening, scatter, and detector response. The analytical expressions were simulated in Spektr3.0 for different bone and solid water thicknesses as per the step phantom. A tray of steel pins was constructed and used with the step phantom to remove the scattered radiation. The simulated theoretical weighting factors were validated by comparing to those from the step phantom measurement. RESULTS: Optimal weighting factor values for the step phantom varied from 0.633 to 1.372 depending on region thickness. Thicker regions required larger weighting factors for bone cancellation. The PP-DE image of the Rando phantom favorably cancelled both ribs and spine, whereas in the conventional DE image, only one could be cancelled at a time. The misaligned ω image was less effective in removing all bones indicating the importance of alignment as part of the PP-DE algorithm implementation. The SNRs for the PP-DE image was larger than those of the conventional DE images for regions which required smaller weighting factors for bone suppression. Comparisons of measured and simulated weighting factors demonstrated a 3% agreement for all bone overlapped regions except for the thickest region with 30 cm of solid water overlapped with 6 cm bone where the signal was lost due to excess attenuation. CONCLUSIONS: A novel PP-DE algorithm was developed which can create higher quality DE images with enhanced bone cancellation and improved noise characteristics compared to conventional DE technique. In addition, theoretical weighting factor expressions were derived and validated against measurement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".