State policy in the sphere of leisure as a component of the protection of national culture: experience of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose of the article is to investigate the evolution of Canada's national policy for the protection of national culture in its leisure dimension by solving the following tasks: to analyse the content of safety of leisure practices, to consider the evolution of the state's relations with the leisure sphere in Canada, to reveal a change of patterns in Canada's public policy regarding leisure and to study its current state. The methodology of the research consists in application of general scientific principle of objectivity, analytical, cultural and comparative methods in researching the public policy in Canada and its integrated programs on supporting national cultural leisure industries, and extrapolating such problems to Ukrainian conditions as tested experience on protection of the national cultural environment. The scientific novelty of the research is the actualization of the positive experience of Canada's public policy in providing support for modern development of leisure and the possibilities of using such a model in Ukraine under the conditions of Russian cultural expansion (and, in fact, armed aggression) for protection and normalization of the functioning of the national cultural environment. Conclusions. Retrospective and modern analysis of the development of the cultural policy of Canada in the leisure sector shows that this area of public management is a complex set of legislative, financial and organizational measures in order to support the creation and dissemination of Canadian cultural product, to encourage a producer and a consumer of cultural services and leisure practices in the functioning of Canadian cultural industries with national content. Drawing attention to the similarity and complexity of the conditions for the existence of domestic cultural industries, the lack of attention to this sector by government authorities and management, it seems relevant to study Canada's experience in providing public policy in the field of national cultural industries in order to implement in practice general management model and principles of its implementation in Ukraine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".