MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905878493 · doi:10.1002/9781119083054.ch12

Using Parent Knowledge to Enhance Teaching and Learning Experiences in Schools for Children and Youth

2018· other· en· W2905878493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Challenges and Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedCraftAffect (linguistics)PsychologyContext (archaeology)Body of knowledgeNatural (archaeology)Descriptive knowledgePedagogyDevelopmental psychologyMathematics educationSocial psychologyKnowledge managementCommunicationComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Craft and professional knowledge is the knowledge which arises from the teaching, learning, and experiences in which one is immersed as one develops one's hobbies and pursues a career path over time. Just as parent knowledge is situated in the mind and body of the parent, it also appears to be situated in abstract and non-rational ways in the metaphysical. Parent knowledge is uncertain knowledge because it is constructed, held, and used in the dynamic context of a family, a unit of people who are always in flux. To engage parents is to establish a side by side relationship with them, in which their parent knowledge is used alongside the teacher's knowledge in decisions which affect them and their children. With authentic engagement, parents maintain their unique positioning as parents, interacting with their children in the natural ways in which parents do, and not as parents who are imitating teachers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Challenges and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207