MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905923757 · doi:10.1306/1213181614017139

Generation and evolution of overpressure caused by hydrocarbon generation in the Jurassic source rocks of the central Junggar Basin, northwestern China

2019· article· en· W2905923757 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaowen Guo, Sheng He, Keyu Liu, Zhi Yang, Shengqiang Yuan, Mingliang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverpressureGeologyChinaStructural basinSource rockPaleontologyGeochemistrySeismologyPetrologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Jurassic black mudstone and coal beds in the central Junggar Basin, northwestern China, are the major source rocks for the basin with type II2 and type III (gas-prone) kerogens. Widespread overpressures are developed in the Jurassic stratigraphic interval. Sonic and resistivity logs display strong characteristic responses of overpressure in the mudstones, with anomalously high acoustic traveltimes and low resistivity compared with the normally pressured mudstones. The overpressured Jurassic sediment sequences appear to have undergone normal compaction because the mudstones exhibit no anomalously low bulk density. The overpressured mudstones deviate from the normally pressured mudstones in density–effective vertical stress space. The overpressure in the Jurassic source rocks is, therefore, not caused by disequilibrium compaction. The overpressured Jurassic sandstone reservoirs are predominantly oil and gas saturated or oil bearing. The well-log responses of the overpressured mudstones and seismic velocity characteristics indicate that the top depth of the overpressure zone ranges from 3800 to 4600 m (12,500 to 15,100 ft), corresponding to formation temperatures of approximately 94°C to 111°C (∼201°F to 232°F), with estimated vitrinite reflectance values of 0.6% to 0.75%. The Jurassic source rocks with overpressure are capable of generating hydrocarbons at present and are currently overpressured. All the evidence suggests that the overpressure in the Jurassic source rocks in the central Junggar Basin is caused by hydrocarbon (HC) generation. The overpressure evolution was modeled quantitatively in response to pressure changes caused by HC generation during basin evolution. The results indicate that multiple episodes of overpressure development and release occurred within the Jurassic source rocks, suggesting multiple episodes of HC expulsion. The timing and numbers of these episodes of HC expulsion were thus determined from the modeled overpressure evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207