MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905931961 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aafaa5

Closed-loop cavitation control for focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier opening by long-circulating microbubbles

2018· article· en· W2905931961 on OpenAlexaff
Mustafa Çavuşoğlu, Jia Zhang, Giovanna D. Ielacqua, Giovanni Pellegrini, Rea Deborah Signorell, Alexandros Papachristodoulou, Davide Brambilla, Patrick Roth, Michael Weller, Markus Rudin, Ernst Martin, Jean‐Christophe Leroux, Beat Werner

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMicrobubblesCavitationUltrasoundBlood–brain barrierLoop (graph theory)Biomedical engineeringMaterials scienceFocused ultrasoundAcousticsMedicinePhysicsInternal medicineCentral nervous systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focused ultrasound (FUS) exposure in the presence of microbubbles (MBs) has been successfully used in the delivery of various sizes of therapeutic molecules across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). While acoustic pressure is correlated with the BBB opening size, real-time control of BBB opening to avoid vascular and neural damage is still a challenge. This arises mainly from the variability of FUS-MB interactions due to the variations of animal-specific metabolic environment and specific experimental setup. In this study, we demonstrate a closed-loop cavitation control framework to induce BBB opening for delivering large therapeutic molecules without causing macro tissue damages. To this end, we performed in mice long-term (5 min) cavitation monitoring facilitated by using long-circulating MBs. Monitoring the long-term temporal kinetics of the MBs under varying level of FUS pressure allowed to identify in situ, animal specific activity regimes forming pressure-dependent activity bands. This enables to determine the boundaries of each activity band (i.e. steady oscillation, transition, inertial cavitation) independent from the physical and physiological dynamics of the experiment. However, such a calibration approach is time consuming and to speed up characterization of the in situ, animal specific FUS-MB dynamics, we tested a novel method called 'pre-calibration' that closely reproduces the results of long-term monitoring but with a much shorter duration. Once the activity bands are determined from the pre-calibration method, an operation band can be selected around the desired cavitation dose. To drive cavitation in the selected operation band, we developed an adaptive, closed-loop controller that updates the acoustic pressure between each sonication based on measured cavitation dose. Finally, we quantitatively assessed the safety of different activity bands and validated the proposed methods and controller framework. The proposed framework serves to optimize the FUS pressure instantly to maintain the targeted cavitation level while improving safety control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207