“Restoring Pride in Jordanian National Identity”: Framing the Jordanian National Identity by the National Committee of Retired Army Veterans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article tackles the issue of the separation between the Jordanian and Palestinian national identities as stated by a group of Jordanian retired military servicemen who named themselves “the National Committee of Retired Army Veterans”. This group has introduced to the Jordanian public a radical conservative discourse that denounces the in-ground reality that Jordan has become an alternative homeland for Palestinian refugees; so the nationality rights of Jordanians of Palestinian origin shall be removed to support their return to the West Bank. Following a historical approach to discourse analysis, the article studies the distribution of a set of topoi , themes or motifs, which are approached by the frequent reference to Jordanian national identity. The discussion is based on a qualitative analysis of a corpus of 29 statement by the Committee and the contexts in which the keywords identity , agenda , naturalization , settlement , quotas , disengagement , and the alternative homeland occur. The article concludes that the Committee’s radical conservative discourse is mostly based by foregrounding the topoi of threat , conspiracy , and their role as a guardian of national identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".