MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906011870 · doi:10.7202/1054304ar

Modélisation des rizières irriguées et intégration dans hydrotel : application au bassin versant de la rivière Cau au Vietnam

2018· article· fr· W2906011870 on OpenAlexaff
Xuan Tuan Nguyen, Nomessi Kokutse, Sophie Duchesne, Babacar Toumbou, Jean‐Pierre Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l eau · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La gestion de l’eau pour l’irrigation des rizières fait appel à des processus complexes. Le modèle Hydrotel est un outil qui permet de simuler les processus hydrologiques à l’échelle des bassins versants. Toutefois, ce modèle ne permet pas de prendre en compte le comportement hydrologique particulier des rizières. La présente étude vise à développer un sous-modèle qui, intégré dans Hydrotel, permettra de prendre en compte le comportement hydrologique des rizières et leur irrigation. Le modèle Hydrotel, avec et sans le sous-modèle développé spécifiquement pour les rizières, a été appliqué sur la partie amont du bassin versant de la rivière Cau au Vietnam. Cette application a démontré que la prise en compte des rizières et la simulation de leur fonctionnement hydrologique, avec le sous-modèle développé, permettent d’améliorer la qualité des simulations hydrologiques sur ce bassin versant. Hydrotel ainsi modifié pourra donc être utilisé, notamment, pour étudier l’impact des rizières sur les ressources en eau de bassins versants où la superficie des rizières est importante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l eauSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207