PELAKSANAAN SANITASI TOTAL BERBASIS MASYARAKATÂ (STBM)Â TERHADAPÂ KEJADIANÂ INFEKSI KECACINGAN PADA PEKERJA PENYADAP KARET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upaya pencegahan dan penanggulangan penyakit yang disebabkan oleh lingkungan khususnya infeksi kecacingan, pemerintah dalam hal ini Kementerian Kesehatan mengeluarkan program unggulan yang patut diuji coba yaitu Sanitasi Total Berbasis Masyarakat (STBM). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan pelaksanaan STBM 5 pilar dengan kejadian penyakit kecacingan pada tenaga penyadap karet di wilayah Pustu Bukit Gadis Puskesmas Cahaya Negeri Kabupaten Seluma. Metode penelitian adalah cross sectional dan dilanjutkan dengan uji statistik. Hasil uji statistik didapatkan ada hubungan yang signifikan 5 variabel STBM dengan kejadian penyakit kecacingan pada tenaga penyadap karet di wilayah Pustu Bukit Gadis. Variabel dominan penyebab penyakit kecacingan yaitu pilar 1 buang air besar sembarangan, pilar 2 cuci tangan pakai sabun dengan air mengalir dan pilar 4 tentang pengelolaan sampah rumah tanggga yang kurang baik. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat dijadikan bahan pertimbangan bagi petugas kesehatan dalam melakukan pembinaan STBM di masyarakat sehingga bisa mendeklarasikan pilar 1 yaitu desa bebas dari buang air besar sembarangan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".