MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906105312 · doi:10.15173/m.v1i33.1795

Caught The Flu? Exploring the novel role of high mobility group box 1 protein in severe influenza infection

2018· article· en· W2906105312 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Danny Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Meducator · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Glycation End Products research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVirologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Severe influenza infections are a common cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is characterized by acute lung injury as well as pulmonary edema or “leakage,” which is caused by endothelial dysfunction and subsequent alveolar flooding from circulating blood vessels. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a protein released from lung endothelial cells that acts as a proinflammatory cytokine during bacterial and viral infections. However, the effect of HMGB1 on the endothelium during influenza viral infection is unknown. This study demonstrates that HMGB1 released from primary human microvascular lung endothelial cells (HLMECs) during influenza infection increases endothelial activation and apoptosis, while also disrupting adherens junctions between cells. Sequestering extracellular HMGB1 using the small molecule glycyrrhizin (GCZ) attenuates these effects, suggesting that HMGB1 signaling occurs in a paracrine manner. Inhibition of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 pathway, a downstream effector of HMGB1, with peptide P5779 did not substantially decrease endothelial apoptosis. Therefore, HMGB1 likely elicits its effects on the endothelium in a TLR4-independent manner. These results will elucidate a partial mechanism that potentially explains ARDS symptoms seen in patients with severe influenza infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe MeducatorSame topicAdvanced Glycation End Products researchFrench-language works237,207