MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906134523 · doi:10.1097/jte.0000000000000083

Impact on Clinical Performance of Required Participation in a Student-Run Pro Bono Clinic

2018· article· en· W2906134523 on OpenAlexaff
Jodi Gilles, Mark D. Bishop, William McGehee, Kevin Lulofs-MacPherson, Kim Dunleavy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternshipAttendanceCompetence (human resources)Medical educationMedicineProfessional developmentService (business)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose. Early opportunities for students to develop clinical skills and professional attributes are important to maximize clinical learning. Student-run pro bono clinics have the potential to provide early contextual exposure. This article describes the impact of required compared to voluntary participation in a student-run pro bono clinic on clinical performance during the first full-time internship. Method/Model Description and Evaluation. Students in the University of Florida Doctor of Physical Therapy program were assigned to one of four service learning groups including a pro bono clinic. While attendance at the clinic was encouraged for all students, only the assigned group was required to attend twice a semester. A retrospective analysis of student performance on the Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) for the first internship was conducted. Clinician CPI ratings were categorized as beginner or intermediate and above. Median scores for safety, professional practice, and practice management items for those students who were required to attend the clinic were compared to students from the other service learning groups who did not attend or attended voluntarily using Chi-square analysis. Outcomes. At midterm, a higher proportion of the required pro bono group were rated as intermediate or above by clinical instructors for safety, all professional practice items except professional development, and all patient management items except diagnosis/prognosis, education, and consideration of financial resources. Differences were present at the final evaluation for safety, professional behavior, cultural competence, clinical reasoning, and examination. Discussion and Conclusion. Positive outcomes were present for students involved in the pro bono clinic, illustrating the potential benefits of required pro bono clinic experiences early in a professional curriculum for accelerating clinical performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.456 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Therapy EducationSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207