MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906152602 · doi:10.7202/1075771ar

Normes sociales, sexuelles et genrées des jeunes détenus en France au moment de leur passage à l’âge adulte

2021· article· fr· W2906152602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yaëlle Amsellem-Mainguy, Benoît Coquard, Arthur Vuattoux

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Jeunes et Société · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se base sur une enquête de terrain menée dans cinq prisons pour mineurs françaises, interrogeant à la fois le moment de la détention, le parcours antérieur et les aspirations des jeunes pour l’avenir. Le regard des jeunes sur leur vie amoureuse et sexuelle présente, mais également sur leur quotidien carcéral et sur leurs aspirations, révèle une grande conformité de leurs attentes à des modes de vie de classe populaire, principalement marqués par la valorisation du travail et de la conjugalité stable hétérosexuelle. De ce point de vue, leur discours dessine un continuum entre les normes sociales, de genre et de sexualité entretenues dans la prison, dans leur quartier et dans ce qu’ils imaginent de leur avenir. Cet article permet également de comprendre le rapport qu’entretiennent ces jeunes à « la jeunesse » dans son ensemble, dont ils font partie tout en s'en sentant exclus, et la manière dont leur situation présente, dévalorisée et dévalorisante à leurs yeux, est le terreau d’une aspiration à la conformité, notamment en matière de position sociale, de genre et de sexualité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Jeunes et SociétéSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207