International Contemporaneity and the Third Havana Bienal (1989)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se concentre sur la troisième Biennale de La Havane (1989) et analyse la conception de la contemporanéité internationale que propose Reiko Tomii afin de diversifier l’histoire des biennales. La contemporanéité internationale mobilise des pratiques locales pour construire des analyses globales qui développent une compréhension polycentrique de l’histoire mondiale de l’art. De même, l’approche commissariale de cette troisième édition visait à décentrer l’art contemporain, en créant une exposition pour les milieux artistiques marginalisés à un moment de tensions politiques, culturelles et économiques à Cuba, et de crise politique mondiale. La troisième Biennale de La Havane s’opposait aux discours eurocentriques dominants de l’histoire de l’art en préconisant la coexistence des multiples arts contemporains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it