MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906164531 · doi:10.15353/jcvis.v4i1.340

MonolithNet: Training monolithic deep neural networks via a partitioned training strategy

2018· article· en· W2906164531 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Rene Bidart, Alexander Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsNvidia
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceResidualDeep neural networksStochastic gradient descentConvergence (economics)Deep learningGradient descentMachine learningAlgorithmGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we explore the training of monolithic deep neural net-works in an effective manner. One of the biggest challenges withtraining such networks to the desired level of accuracy is the dif-ficulty in converging to a good solution using iterative optimizationmethods such as stochastic gradient descent due to the enormousnumber of parameters that need to be learned. To achieve this,we introduce a partitioned training strategy, where proxy layersare connected to different partitions of a deep neural network toenable isolated training of a much smaller number of parametersto convergence. To illustrate the efficacy of this training strategy,we introduce MonolithNet, a massive residual deep neural networkconsisting of 437 million parameters. The trained MonolithNet wasable to achieve a top-1 accuracy of 97% on the CIFAR10 imageclassification dataset, which demonstrates the feasibility of the pro-posed training strategy for training monolithic deep neural networksto high accuracies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational Vision and Imaging SystemsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207