Screening of Some Essential Oil Constituents as Potential Inhibitors of the ATP Synthase of <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Many novel bacterial targets and natural inhibitors of enzymes are currently being considered to overcome antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli . Hence, in this study, 20 essential oil constituents were screened for their potential inhibitory effect on E. coli ATP synthase. This enzyme is involved in the hydrolysis of ATP into ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi). First, E. coli membrane ATP synthase was isolated via cell lysis. A spectrophotometric method was optimized to quantify the released phosphate from ATP hydrolysis in order to follow the enzymatic activity. The method was validated by determining the kinetic parameters of this reaction ( K m = 144.66 μM and V max = 270.27 μM/min), and through the inhibition assays of ATP synthase using three reference inhibitors, thymoquinone (half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ] = 50.93 μM), resveratrol (maximum inhibition of 40%), and quercetin (IC 50 = 29.01 μM). Among the studied essential oil components, α‐terpinene was the most potent inhibitor (IC 50 = 19.74 μM) followed by β‐pinene, isoeugenol, eugenol, and estragole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".