A Culture of Entitlement, Silence and Protection: The Case of the University of Ottawa’s Men’s Hockey Team
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En fevrier 2014, un scandale a ebranle l’universite d’Ottawa (Canada) quand des joueurs d’un club de hockey ont agresse une jeune femme durant une joute. On a du annuler la saison 2014-15. Les quatre journaux locaux en ont beaucoup parle donnant la parole aux joueurs de hockey eux-memes. Ce papier base sur 55 articles sur le sujet decele et analyse les trois cultures de la masculinite decrite par Michael Kimmel (2008) dans la dynamique du club:celle qui donne le droit, la culture du silence et la culture de protection. En creusant la comprehension des cultures masculines du jeu, ce papier met en evidence l’envahissante regle patriarcale des clubs universitaires presents sur les campus. La presse locale en leur donnant la parole a mis l’accent sur leurs droits et s’est rangee de leur cote au detriment de la survivante et de son experience de l’assaut. Elle ajoute une discussion autour de l’implication du campus, des athletes mâles et les medias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.088 | 0.058 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".