‘But for the Loves of the Fishes’: Maritime Labour and Ecological Culture in Nineteenth-century Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Over the past twenty years, researchers have emphasized the importance of the early modern capitalist organization of maritime labour, whether in seafaring, fishing, or hunting sea mammals; they depict maritime labourers as either market agents or the vanguard of proletarian resistance to exploitation at sea. Yet works on seafaring in New England and Atlantic Canada suggest that maritime workers often served in paternalistic relationships defined by the bonds of kin and community in the ports from which they sailed. Most seafarers worked for short periods of their lives in deep-sea trades; they otherwise worked in a variety of related trades ashore, or within the context of much more household-like, small-scale production in fisheries or coastal trading, such as in the case of outport Newfoundland. We must pay more attention to the wider culture of such people, which mediated the exchange between their work and capitalist market imperatives and demonstrates that in such an environment, the moral world of preindustrial communities did not simply dissolve in the alienated relationships between labour and capital at sea. The maritime labourers of Newfoundland worked in an international capitalist economy, but capitalist social relations did not define completely their social, economic, and ecological relationships. In the Newfoundland case, notions of a moral economy, of what comprised ‘fair’ exchange between employers and employed, or between merchants and fishers, emerged in close association with the entrenchment of household production in the outport fishery after 1815. Such concepts persisted through the early twentieth century, and suggest an early sensitivity to the ecological problem of resource depletion associated with more capital-intensive forms of marine-resource harvesting. Not all European settlers on the North Atlantic littoral embraced mechanistic market values and systems of property rights associated with the Scientific Revolution and the maturation of capitalism in Europe by the end of the eighteenth century. The depleted ground fisheries of Atlantic Canada might mislead us with the notion that the history of outport Newfoundland has been that of the unremitting exhaustion of marine resources. However, fishing people expressed ecological concerns by drawing on older Anglo-American understandings about the rights of the commons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".