Electric Field Probe for Time-Domain Monitoring of Radio Frequency Exposure During Development and Evaluation of MRI-Conditional Medical Devices at 3 T
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design and validation of a tuned time-domain electric field probe for mapping of radio frequency (RF) exposures used during testing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional medical devices. The probes were 5 and 10 mm short dipole antenna, developed as a tradeoff between spatial resolution, linearity, and sensitivity. The probes were tuned and matched at a center frequency of 127.6 MHz, which corresponds to the RF frequency for 3T MRI scanners. To improve the accuracy and sensitivity, an RF low noise amplifier with high gain and very low noise figure was developed, followed by distributed λ/4 baluns along a triaxial cable to reduce the electric field pickup in the MRI environment. The probe was fabricated on a double-sided printed circuit board, FR4 thickness of 1.57 mm and a copper thickness of 35 μm. Theoretical analysis was performed to calculate the exposed electric field from the real-time receive signals. To verify the probe performance finitedifference time-domain method simulations were compared to the actual measured electric fields. Developed probe was tested in a commercially available 3T RF exposure system to determine the probe dynamic range and linearity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it