MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906316913 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2018.8585781

Behavioral device-level modeling of modular multilevel converters in real time for variable-speed drive applications

2018· article· en· W2906316913 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Lin, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayGate arrayEmulationModular designComputer scienceConvertersHardware emulationElectronic engineeringInterfacingEmbedded systemVoltageComputer hardwareEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the real-time hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) emulation of an induction machine (IM) driven by a modular multilevel converter (MMC) on the field-programmable gate array (FPGA). The insulated gate bipolar transistors and antiparallel diodes of the MMC are modeled with nonlinear static and dynamic characteristics to provide not only accurate system-level performance of the converter but also insight into the power losses under different operation conditions. Due to the large network size of the MMC, its solution in conjunction with the IM fifth-order model proved to be a significant computational challenge. Therefore, circuit partitioning based on the transmission line modeling is proposed, which introduced an interface to the electrical network for the IM as well as split the multiloop MMC into several smaller subcircuits in terms of matrix size, and consequently enabled a fully parallel implementation on the FPGA. Control strategies for the MMC and IM are also emulated in hardware, and due to the large latency difference between subcircuits and controllers, the overall system hardware design is divided into several layers, each having an independent time step ranging from 500 ns to 4 μs so as to attain the goal of real-time execution. A comparison of transient and steady-state results from the HIL emulation and offline simulation tools shows high accuracy of the modeling approach as well as the efficacy of proposed multiple time steps in achieving real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207