Cystic fibrosis in Canada: A historical perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cystic Fibrosis Canada (CF Canada) is a productive model of collaboration between families and the scientific and medical communities. The impetus for this response to a rare and then poorly understood, inherited condition started with Doug and Donna Summerhayes who arranged a meeting for parents of children with CF at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) in Toronto in 1959. The Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (now CF Canada) was founded the following year.By that time, specialized CF clinics had been established to treat pediatric patients in Montreal, Toronto, and Halifax. The first CF clinic for young adults opened in Montreal in 1969 and the increase in clinics serving adult patients (now 24) over the last five decades is a testament to the ever-growing adult CF population. Today, there are 42 accredited clinics across Canada providing multidisciplinary care to over 4200 children and adults with CF.In 1967, CF Canada began clinic accreditation, a national quality improvement effort involving peer-review by CF healthcare professionals. Accreditation site visits are designed to allow sharing of best practices among Canadian CF clinics. As a complement to this program, CF Canada offers annual Clinic Incentive Grants (CIGs) to enhance the standard of CF care by providing funds for patient care and teaching.With the assistance of CF Canada’s CIGs and research grants, Canada has pioneered major improvements in CF knowledge and care. In 1972, Crozier recommended a revolutionary new diet high in saturated fat supplemented with high doses of pancreatic enzymes. Resultant mortality at the clinic decreased to a rate dramatically lower than clinics in the U.S.1 Crozier DN. Cystic fibrosis: a not-so-fatal disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1974;21(4):935–950.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] In a subsequent study, patients receiving long-term inhaled tobramycin showed stable pulmonary function and better clinical status than patients receiving saline alone.2 MacLusky IB, Gold R, Corey M, Levison H. Long-term effects of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1989;7(1):42–48. doi:10.1002/ppul.1950070110.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] These key findings contributed to growing support for improved nutrition and control of endobronchial infection in the treatment of patients with CF, now key components of standard practice.Canadian physicians also profoundly influenced the field of lung transplantation. After 44 unsuccessful attempts globally, surgeons at Toronto General Hospital performed the world’s first successful single and double lung transplants in 1983 and 1986, respectively, followed by the first successful double lung transplant for CF in 1988. In the 28 years that followed, 694 CF patients received lung transplants at one of five transplant centers in Canada, which have been supported, in part, by CF Canada’s Transplant Centre Incentive Grants.3 Cystic Fibrosis Canada. The Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry: 2016 Annual Data Report. Toronto; 2017. [Google Scholar]A key component of the direction of CF Canada has been the support of research initiatives; to-date, the organization has invested over $182 million in research programs. A singular landmark in the history of CF research was the identification of the gene responsible for CF. In 1989, SickKids’ Lap-Chee Tsui and John Riordan, together with Francis Collins at the University of Michigan, announced the discovery of the gene responsible for CF in three seminal articles simultaneously published in Science (Figure 1).4–6 Kerem B, Rommens JM, Buchanan JA, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis. Science 1989;245(4922):1073–1080. doi:10.1126/science.2570460. Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem B, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science 1989;245(4922):1066–1073. doi:10.1126/science.2475911. Rommens J, Iannuzzi M, Kerem B, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: chromosome walking and jumping. Science 1989;245(4922):1059–1065. doi:10.1126/science.2772657. The discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene was a breakthrough viewed as one of the most outstanding achievements in the field of human genetics. With no information on the biochemical basis of the disease, the researchers were the first to use positional cloning to isolate the gene at a time when the human genome had not yet been mapped and sequenced. The successful strategy provided the impetus for the mapping of the entire human genome during the following decade, and was rapidly applied to many other diseases.7 Collins FS. Positional cloning moves from perditional to traditional. Nat Genet. 1995;9(4):347–350. doi:10.1038/ng0495-347.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] This new knowledge provided extensive information on the structure and putative function of the protein product and propelled CF research ahead in Canada and around the world. Although the initial report described the F508del mutation and at least 7 other putative mutations, only months later, Tsui founded the Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium to catalogue the rapidly growing list of mutations. The online Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database, launched in 1995, underscores the astounding complexity of CF; as of December 2017, there were 2023 CFTR mutations listed.8 Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database. 2017. http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca. Accessed December 21, 2017. [Google Scholar]The Canadian CF Registry (CCFR; formerly, Canadian Patient Data Registry) was established by Mary Corey and records date back to 1967. By 1973, all 20 existing Canadian clinics were contributing data to an international registry and the first joint U.S.-Canada report was published in 1978.9 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. 1976 Report on Survival Studies of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. Atlanta; 1978. [Google Scholar] In 1984, CF Canada assumed responsibility for maintaining an exclusively Canadian registry. Today, all accredited CF clinics submit data to the CCFR as a condition for receiving CIGs from CF Canada; in turn, each clinic has access to national epidemiological information as well as data specific to their respective clinic. With the majority of the Canadian CF population represented in the CCFR, the Registry allows identification of national and local trends and helps to guide clinical care, basic research, design of clinical trials, and quality improvement.These and many other exceptional Canadian achievements in CF research and care form the basis of several major new initiatives in research and knowledge translation aimed at correcting the basic defect that causes CF such that the estimated median age of survival of individuals born with CF will one day match that of the general population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".