Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy student perceptions of the entry-level Doctor of Pharmacy degree: A qualitative study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Canadian academic pharmacy institutions are undergoing a credential shift from a baccalaureate degree to an entry-level Doctor of Pharmacy (ELPD). Objective: To characterise how Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy (BSP) students perceive this transition. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight randomly-selected students from each BSP class in 2017-18. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo qualitative analysis software. Results: Students’ opinions on the impact of the Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) varied (n=24). Six themes emerged: positive academic and social experiences, perceptions of the Pharm.D. programme, insecurities of BSP students, impact on future employment, mixed plans to pursue Pharm.D., and suggestions for improvement. Participants were concerned about Pharm.D. graduates being preferentially hired for hospital pharmacy jobs. Conclusion: Increased dialogue between faculty and students is necessary to provide reassurance. The credential shift to Pharm.D. should not deter BSP graduates’ desire to work in a specific practice setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it