MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906356283 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2888903

Machine Learning and Uncertainty Quantification for Surrogate Models of Integrated Devices With a Large Number of Parameters

2018· article· en· W2906356283 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Riccardo Trinchero, Mourad Larbi, Hakki Mert Torun, Flavio Canavero, Madhavan Swaminathan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPolynomial chaosSupport vector machineUncertainty quantificationSurrogate modelComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceLeast squares support vector machineRandom forestSet (abstract data type)PolynomialAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsMonte Carlo method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the application of the support vector machine (SVM) and the least-squares SVM regressions to the uncertainty quantification of complex systems with a high-dimensional parameter space. The above regression techniques are used to build accurate and compact surrogate models of the system responses from a limited set of training samples. The accuracy and the feasibility of the proposed modeling techniques are then investigated by comparing their results with the ones predicted by a sparse polynomial chaos expansion by considering two real-life problems with 8 and 30 random variables, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207