MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906377051 · doi:10.1002/nop2.231

Predictors of new graduate nurses’ health over the first 4 years of practice

2018· article· en· W2906377051 on OpenAlex
Heather K. Spence Laschinger, Carol Wong, Emily Read, Greta G. Cummings, Michael P. Leiter, Maura MacPhee, Sandra Regan, Ann Rhéaume‐Brüning, Judith A. Ritchie, Vanessa Burkoski, Doris Grinspun, Mary Ellen Gurnham, Sherri Huckstep, Lianne Jeffs, Sandra MacDonald‐Rencz, Maurio Ruffolo, Judith Shamian, Angela C. Wolff, Carol Young‐Ritchie, Kevin Wood

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Open · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsCancer Care South EastSt. Michael's HospitalCapital District Health AuthorityHealth CanadaRegistered Nurses' Association of OntarioLondon Health Sciences CentreMcGill University Health CentreWestern UniversityUniversité de MonctonVictorian Order of NursesUniversity of British ColumbiaAcadia UniversityFraser HealthProvidence Health CareUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaNova Scotia Health Research FoundationRegistered Nurses' Association of OntarioLondon Health Sciences CentreAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsCapital Health
KeywordsMental healthLogistic regressionPsychologyRegression analysisClinical psychologyMedicineOccupational safety and healthOccupational stressPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To examine predictors of Canadian new graduate nurses' health outcomes over 1 year. DESIGN: A time-lagged mail survey was conducted. METHOD: = 406) responded to a mail survey at two time points: November 2012-March 2013 (Time 1) and May-July 2014 (Time 2). Multiple linear regression (mental and overall health) and logistic regression (post-traumatic stress disorder risk) analyses were conducted to assess the impact of Time 1 predictors on Time 2 health outcomes. RESULTS: Both situational and personal factors were significantly related to mental and overall health and post-traumatic stress disorder risk. Regression analysis identified that cynicism was a significant predictor of all three health outcomes, while occupational coping self-efficacy explained unique variance in mental health and work-life interference explained unique variance in post-traumatic stress disorder risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it