MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906406767 · doi:10.1126/science.aaw0443

Protect Third Pole's fragile ecosystem

2018· letter· en· W2906406767 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Liu, Richard I. Milne, Marc W. Cadotte, Zeng‐Yuan Wu, Jim Provan, Guang-Fu Zhu, Lian‐Ming Gao, Li D

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcosystemEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding mountains, often termed the Third Pole, contain more ice than anywhere outside the Arctic and Antarctic (1). This region is also the source of the nine largest rivers in Asia, providing fresh water, food, and other ecosystem services to more than 1.5 billion people (2). Climate and topography vary greatly across the region, promoting rich biodiversity from species to ecosystems. Unfortunately, the Third Pole region is highly vulnerable to environmental changes (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207