MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906487139 · doi:10.1121/1.5082548

Microphone array beamforming based on maximization of the front-to-back ratio

2018· article· en· W2906487139 on OpenAlexaff
Xianghui Wang, Jacob Benesty, Israel Cohen, Jingdong Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersIsrael Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReverberationBeamformingAcousticsComputer scienceMicrophoneDirectivityMicrophone arrayNoise (video)Interference (communication)Adaptive beamformerMaximizationWhite noiseSpeech recognitionTelecommunicationsPhysicsMathematicsAntenna (radio)Mathematical optimizationLoudspeakerArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microphone arrays are typically used in room acoustic environments to acquire high fidelity audio and speech signals while suppressing noise, interference, and reverberation. In many application scenarios, interference and reverberation may mainly come from a certain region, and it is therefore necessary to develop beamformers that can preserve signals of interest while minimizing the power of signals coming from the region where interference and reverberation dominate. For this purpose, this paper first reexamines the so-called front-to-back ratio and the classical supercardioid beamformer. To deal with the white noise amplification problem and the limited directivity factor associated with the supercardioid beamformer, a set of reduced-rank beamformers are deduced by using the well-known joint diagonalization technique, which can make compromises between the front-to-back ratio and the amount of white noise amplification or the directivity factor. Then, the definition of the front-to-back ratio is extended to a generalized version, from which another set of reduced-rank beamformers and their regularized versions are developed. Simulations are conducted to illustrate the properties and advantages of the proposed beamformers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207