MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906531228 · doi:10.36939/cjur/vol27no1/art114

Municipal Reforms in Montreal and the Issue of Fairness

2018· article· en· W2906531228 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Jean‐Philippe Meloche, Maxime Leblanc-Desgagné

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of urban research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Government Finance and Decentralization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsMetropolitan areaEquity (law)Corporate governancePublic administrationPolitical scienceGeographyBusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Municipal governance in the Montreal metropolitan region has recently undergone several phases oftransformation. The first, in 2001-2002, was characterized by amalgamation and the introduction of ametropolitan governance structure. This was followed, in 2006, by a round of de-amalgamation. Using annualmunicipal data on residential tax base and global tax rate covering the period from 1996 to 2011 for allmunicipalities of the metropolitan area, the impacts of these reforms on fairness are estimated. Our findingsshow that amalgamation raises equity among municipalities and that de-amalgamation partly reintroducedinequity in the metropolitan area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of urban researchSame topicLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationFrench-language works237,207