MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906597006 · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15148

Postruminal infusion of calcium gluconate increases milk fat production and alters fecal volatile fatty acid profile in lactating dairy cows

2018· article· en· W2906597006 on OpenAlexaff
John Doelman, Leslie L. McKnight, Michelle Carson, K. Nichols, D.F. Waterman, J.A. Metcalf

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgResearch
KeywordsLatin squareSilageDry matterChemistryFecesTotal mixed rationDairy cattleFood scienceAnimal scienceCalciumHayAbomasumRumenFatty acidButyric acidLactationBiologyBiochemistryFermentationIce calving

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gluconic acid is a carboxylic acid naturally occurring in plants and honey. In nonruminant animals, gluconic acid has been shown to increase gastrointestinal butyrate concentrations and improve growth performance, but a ruminant application remains undescribed. This experiment examined the effects of postruminal calcium gluconate (CaG) on milk production, fecal volatile fatty acid concentrations, and plasma metabolite concentrations in lactating dairy cows. Six rumen cannulated multiparous Holstein cows (60 ± 6 d in milk) were randomly assigned to 6 treatment sequences within a 6 × 6 Latin square design in which each experimental period consisted of 5 d of continuous postruminal infusion followed by a 2 d wash-out period. Test treatments included a negative control (CON; 0.90% NaCl wt/vol), positive control (Na-butyrate, 135 g/d), and 4 doses of CaG (44, 93, 140, and 187 g/d). Cows received a total mixed ration (31% corn silage, 28% alfalfa silage, 5% hay, 36% concentrate) with dry matter intake fixed (25.3 ± 1.7 kg/d) throughout the experiment. On d 5 of each infusion period, samples of milk, feces, and blood were collected from each animal. Calcium gluconate treatments increased milk fat concentration, and a tendency was observed for increased milk fat yield and energy-corrected milk yield above levels achieved by CON, with maximal treatment responses of 4.43% (CON 3.81%), 2.089 kg/d (CON 1.760 kg/d), and 51.8 kg/d (CON 47.1 kg/d), respectively. Concentrations of iso-butyric acid in feces were greater in cows infused with CaG (13.3 µmol/g) treatments compared with CON (9.7 µmol/g). Arterial concentrations of glucose and nonesterified fatty acids were lower (glucose: CaG 2.98 mmol/L, CON 3.29 mmol/L and nonesterified fatty acids: CaG 0.130 mmol/L vs. 0.148 mmol/L) and β-hydroxybutyrate higher (CaG 1.703 vs. CON 0.812) in cows infused with CaG than CON. Together, these results suggest that postruminal infusion of CaG may alter metabolic mechanisms to support a milk fat production response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207