MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906604763 · doi:10.1029/2018tc005295

The 3D Geophysical Investigation of a Middle Cretaceous to Paleocene Regional Décollement in the Cordillera of Northern Canada and Alaska

2018· article· en· W2906604763 on OpenAlexaffabout
N Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousDécollementThrust faultPaleontologySedimentary rockFault (geology)Inversion (geology)Tectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new approach to the 3D inversion and interpretation of gravity data is applied to the crustal architecture of the northern Cordillera of Canada and Alaska. The technique models the distribution and depth extent of rocks with systematic density contrasts, such as sedimentary or intrusive rocks. In the northern Cordillera, the geometry of low‐density zones, primarily associated with middle to Late Cretaceous granitic intrusions, and Neoproterozoic and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks, is defined. Variation in the depth extent of these zones delimits a surface, interpreted herein as a regional décollement syntectonic with, or postdating, middle Cretaceous intrusions, but predating and displaced ~430 km by the Eocene‐aged Tintina fault. The décollement trends N35°E and shallows from a depth of ~15–20 km beneath Selwyn basin to ~11 km beneath the Mackenzie Mountains. Here surface faults echo the décollement geometry, linked to fold and thrust belt development between the middle Cretaceous and Paleocene. The décollement continues southward for an unknown distance into northern British Columbia, but the Liard line represents a structural discontinuity between the fold and thrust belts of the Mackenzie Mountains and northern Rocky Mountains. The décollement's northwestern extent is broadly defined by surface faults in the northern Ogilvie Mountains. However, prior to Tintina fault displacement, the décollement was likely connected to a fold and thrust belt and related décollement in east‐central Alaska. Estimates of post‐middle Cretaceous exhumation suggest regional tectonic modification of the décollement, possibly including the presently active detachment inferred for the weak lower crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207