MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906703836 · doi:10.25675/10217/181739

Building resilience of Mongolian rangelands: a trans-disciplinary research conference

2015· article· en· W2906703836 on OpenAlexfundno aff
María E. Fernández‐Giménez, Batkhishig Baival, Steven R. Fassnacht, David Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Forest ServiceAgricultural Research ServiceAlabama Agricultural Experiment StationU.S. Forest ServiceMinistry of Education, IndiaNational Research Foundation of KoreaUnited Nations Development ProgrammeNational Research FoundationSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaInternational Development Research CentreUtah State UniversityWarner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureColorado State UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiLambda Alpha InternationalLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia UniversityJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Geographic SocietyAmerican Center for Mongolian StudiesWenner-Gren FoundationChina Scholarship CouncilMinistry of EnvironmentNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationJapanese Foundation for Prostate ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsResilience (materials science)RangelandDisciplineEnvironmental resource managementPolitical scienceGeographyEnvironmental planningEnvironmental ethicsSociologyAgroforestryEnvironmental scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mongolia is a semi-arid and arid country in Asia where the climate has been changing more drastically than many other locations across the globe. The proceedings of the "Trans-disciplinary Research Conference: Building Resilience of Mongolian Rangelands" is divided into five sections: 1) Rangeland Ecology and Management, 2) Climate Change and Hydrology, 3) Institutional Innovations in Mongolian Rangelands, 4) Social and Economic Development in Rural Mongolia, and 5) Methods of Knowledge and Data Integration. The papers presented provide cause for concern regarding observed changes in climate, rangeland conditions and livestock populations, as well as reasons for hope and motivations for action to address the current challenges. We hope that this volume and the conference it accompanies, will inspire renewed commitment to support science and science-based policy-making and management to sustain Mongolia's unique natural and cultural heritage as they adapt to a changing planet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University)Same topicRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyFrench-language works237,207