MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2906716429 · doi:10.14288/1.0372074

The land beyond the forest : a conceptual novella and accompanying essay on settler responses to Indigenous people’s in genre and conceptual writing

2019· article· en· W2906716429 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carter Anthony Trystan

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNovellaIndigenousSociologyEcocriticismConceptual frameworkHistoryLiteratureSocial scienceArtEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Land beyond the Forest is a conceptual, found-text novella that blends public domain texts from and about Canada’s Fur Trade-era with the core text from Bram Stoker’s Dracula. In addition to the novel is an essay detailing the treatment and representation of Indigenous peoples in a range of texts from early Canadian Gothic novels and poems as well as more recent works such as film westerns and Canadian conceptual and experimental poetry. The novella and essay are working in concert to read the ways Settler writers in North America have appropriated and misrepresented Indigenous culture and how they continue to do so despite attempting redress and reconciliation in their work. I conclude by demonstrating how conceptual writing is a viable way for non-Indigenous writers to contribute to reconciliation, both by citing recent examples and presenting my own work, while avoiding the errors Settler writers in more conventional forms of writing continue to make.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.025
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→