Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enfant ? puis adolescent ? dans les Prairies, Donald est un garcon obstine qui veut comprendre d'ou il vient. Pousse par un instinct archeologique, il n'aura de cesse d'explorer le territoire environnant, a la recherche du pourquoi des choses. Gravures rupestres, cimetiere de bisons ou rituel sur une montagne sacree, les decouvertes du jeune homme donnent vie au passe des grands espaces de l'Ouest canadien.Jeremie Gindre reinvente ici le nature writing avec un style fort et drole, donnant a ressentir autant qu'a comprendre l'univers de Donald.Ne a Geneve en 1978, Jeremie Gindre a decide de ne pas choisir entre arts plastiques et litterature. Sa pratique comprend l'ecriture comme le dessin ou l'installation, et explore ici des themes aussi varies que la formation des orages, les techniques de chasse prehistorique ou le folklore western. Il a notamment publie On a eu du mal aux editions de L'Olivier en 2013.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".