MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906816347 · doi:10.14288/1.0300374

Stormwater treatment through planter boxes for contaminants originating from metal roofs at the Annacis Island warehouse

2017· article· en· W2906816347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Skaloud

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormwaterBioretentionSurface runoffEnvironmental scienceLow-impact developmentSwaleEnvironmental planningEnvironmental engineeringCivil engineeringStormwater managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this report is to provide options for stormwater contaminant treatment from metal roofs at the Annacis Warehouse, a site under Port of Vancouver jurisdiction. Specifically, this project looks at how existing planter boxes, which are rain gardens in a box, are potential treatment solutions for exceedances of heavy metals in current stormwater. These boxes are capable of treating and removing various contaminants from stormwater through mechanisms including adsorption and vegetative uptake. The following report argues for the implementation of a pilot planter box at the site, given support from academic literature, expert interviews, as well as various case studies using similar technologies. In order to implement a planter box, various variables need to be considered. A few of these include size of the existing site and the box, installation requirements, local meteorological conditions, bioretention media, and the use of specific vegetation. As every site is different due to the variability of metal roofs and local water quality guidelines, planter boxes need to be carefully selected or built in order to increase the likelihood of successful treatment. Academic literature supports planter boxes for the treatment of stormwater runoff from metal roofs, but does tend to focus on galvanized iron roofs and treatment options for high levels of zinc. Two expert interviews were conducted with Jennifer Foster of KWL Engineering and Michael MacLatchy of Associated Engineering. These interviews have provided recommendations on maintenance requirements and other variables. Examining case studies in other areas of the Pacific Northwest is also used extensively in this report, with other ports and industries also looking to treat metal roof runoff through the use of planter boxes. This report will argue that the Port of Vancouver install two planter boxes with slight differences at the Annacis Island Warehouse based on the general design of the ‘Grattix’, a planter box initially built at the Port of Vancouver in Washington, USA. With slight modifications, this planter box is most viable at the site due to its low cost, easy installation, and use of native materials. Maintenance requirements as well as avenues for further research are also emphasized towards the end of the report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207