MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906848335 · doi:10.1109/mic.2018.2890234

Integration of Wireless Sensor Networks and Smart UAVs for Precision Viticulture

2019· article· en· W2906848335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet Computing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer sciencePrecision agricultureReal-time computingWirelessProfitability indexProduction (economics)Wireless networkThroughputTelecommunicationsComputer networkBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precision viticulture (PV) aims to improve the grapevine production efficiency, quality, and profitability, while reducing the environmental impact. The promises of PV are realized only if large areas are monitored with high spatial and temporal resolutions. This paper considers the integration of a wireless sensor network and a smart unmanned aerial vehicle platform. To this end, local variations of factors that influence grape yield and quality are measured and site-specific management practices are applied. This approach achieves real-time, uninterrupted monitoring of the vine growth environment, and on-demand imaging and high-resolution data collection from any specific location, thereby optimizing the production efficiencies and the application of inputs in a cost-effective way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it