MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906879633 · doi:10.4000/books.aaccademia.4595

Predicting Emoji Exploiting Multimodal Data: FBK Participation in ITAmoji Task

2018· book-chapter· en· W2906879633 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAccademia University Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
KeywordsEmojiTask (project management)Ranking (information retrieval)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Natural language processingTraining setArtificial intelligenceInformation retrievalMachine learningWorld Wide WebEngineeringSocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present our approach that has won the ITAmoji task of the 2018 edition of the EVALITA evaluation campaign1. ITAmoji is a classification task for predicting the most probable emoji (a total of 25 classes) to go along with the target tweet written by a given person in Italian. We demonstrate that using only textual features is insufficient to achieve reasonable performance levels on this task and propose a system that is able to benefit from the multimodal information contained in the training set, enabling significant gains and earning us the first place in the final ranking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it