Zoonotic Yersinia Enterocolitica Infection: Host Range, Clinical Manifestations, and Transmission Between Animals and Man
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter deals with zoonotic aspects of Y. enterocolitica infection with special reference to the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica in animals and any clinical manifestations in the different animal species. It discusses the tentative role of animals as the transmitters of Y. enterocolitica bacteria to humans. Recovery of Y. enterocolitica from animals was described for the first time in the early 1960s from swine, chinchillas, and hares. The frequency of performed isolations of Y. enterocolitica has risen dramatically in recent years. Isolations of Y. enterocolitica have been obtained from zoo animals, such as the camel, monkey, ocelot, and Pekin robin. In studies reported from Europe, Japan, Canada, and South Africa Y. enterocolitica serotype O:3 has in many cases been isolated from pigs. Isolation of Y. enterocolitica from deer has been reported from the United States and Japan. The clinical symptomatology resembled that seen in earlier cases of Y. pseudotuberculosis infections in the zoo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".