MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906963126 · doi:10.36572/csm.2018.vol.56.05

Prospecções sobre a relação entre as comunidades do bairro Reis Católicos (Alcalá de Henares, Madrid) e seus bens arqueológicos

2018· article· pt· W2906963126 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositório Científico Lusófona (Grupo Lusófona) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Cultural heritageWorld heritageQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchaeologyHistoryMulticulturalismGeographyHumanitiesSociologyArtTourism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ideias convergentes sobre temáticas de interesses em comum levaram-nos a iniciar alguns estudos em conjunto. Essas pesquisas enfocam as estratégias de gestão arqueológica em cidades ibero-americanas declaradas Patrimônio Mundial pela UNESCO e ainda as relações entre o patrimônio cultural e as comunidades nos mais distintos contextos urbanos. Este artigo está dedicado a um deles. Resulta de um ensaio, uma experiência-piloto realizada nas etapas finais do projeto I+D “La Dimensión Arqueológica en ciudades Patrimonio Mundial: avances para la gestión patrimonial en Alcalá de Henares, Puebla y La Habana”. Tencionávamos reunir dados sobre a relação entre as comunidades que habitam o bairro periférico de Reis Católicos e os bens culturais nesse contexto, especificamente as ruínas musealizadas da cidade romana de Complutum, para pautas de comportamento para a estruturação de um projeto futuro. Objetivamos com este artigo apresentar os resultados das pesquisas de campo, realizadas em novembro de 2015 e junho de 2016, quando experimentamos duas metodologias distintas, nomeadamente a observação assistemática e a deriva. Os resultados alcançados sugerem que o o sítio arqueológico musealizado faz parte do cotidiano dos vizinhos, membros de uma vizinhança cambiante, marcada atualmente pelos seus traços multiculturais e pela ressonância com outros marcos de memória existentes no bairro. Palavras-chave: patrimônio arqueológico; comunidades; gestão do patrimônio

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it