Fertility and reproductive care in chronic kidney disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In both women and men, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with decreased fertility. Though a multitude of factors contribute to the reduction in fertility in this population, progressively impaired function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis appears to play a key role in the pathophysiology. There is limited research on strategies to manage infertility in the CKD population, but intensive hemodialysis, kidney transplantation, medication management and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have all been proposed. Though fertility and reproductive care are reported as important elements of care by CKD patients themselves, few nephrology clinicians routinely address fertility and reproductive care in clinical interactions. Globally, the average age of parenthood is increasing, with concurrent growth and expansion in the use of ART. Coupled with an increasing prevalence of CKD in women and men of reproductive age, the importance of understanding fertility and reproductive technologies in this population is highlighted. This review endeavors to explore the female and male factors that affect fertility in the CKD population, as well as the evidence supporting strategies for reproductive care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it