MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2907020151

Dust and ashes: : A picture of Liaoning's magnesia industry

2017· article· en· W2907020151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Albert P. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic shortageDynamiteMagnesiumBusinessAgricultural economicsQuarter (Canadian coin)EngineeringCommerceNatural resource economicsGeographyMetallurgyEconomicsExplosive materialArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental inspections and a ban on the sale of dynamite have led to supply shortages of magnesia in the world's biggest producing region and, as Albert Li, IM Correspondent found on a recent visit to the area, anger is rising among companies in the sector. Attendees of this year's MagMin field trip to several magnesia plants inspect a recent batch of fused magnesia at the warehouse of Liaoning New Development Refractory Group In the second quarter of this year, spot environmental inspections by Chinese officials, coupled with restrictions on the sale of dynamite, delivered a shock to Liaoning's magnesia companies. The resulting shortage of magnesia supply from Liaoning, the world's main magnesia-producing region, caught both domestic and international magnesia consumers off guard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207